iMOL
 
 
Silence is not an option when things are ill done - Lord Alfred Dennings
Google
Web imol
 
 

 

 

All Categories

·

 

Samy Vellu's attack dogs 7 (Highlights)
Survey

 

MIC Elections 2009
Kampung Buah Pala Issue (The High Chaparral)
.What's Happening ?
 
 
Representatives
Member of Parliament
List of Tamil Schools
Selangor
W. Persekutuan
Perak
Johor
P. Pinang
Pahang
Negeri Sembilan
Melaka
Perlis & Kelantan
 
 
Tamil Song Lyrics
Quote
midb

Malaysian Indian Minority and Human Rights Violations Annual Report 2008

Teaching Maths & Science in English?

 

 

What’s Next For Anwar’s Accuser?

January 11, 2012, By James Hookway, WSJ

Agence France-Presse/Getty Images
Malaysian opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim’s accuser, Mohamad Saiful Bukhari Azlan, waves from a car on Feb. 4 2010.

KUALA LUMPUR — Now that Malaysian opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim has been acquitted of sodomy, what’s next for the aide who accused him, 26-year-old Saiful Bukhari Azlan?

So far it’s not clear. Mr. Saiful couldn’t be reached for comment. But he suggested on his blog Monday that Judge Zabadin Diah’s verdict might not be the end of the two-year drama that has riveted this country of 28 million people. “My family and I hope the prosecution will bring this case to the Appeals Court,” Mr. Saiful wrote.

Prosecutors have roughly two weeks to decide whether to appeal Mr. Anwar’s acquittal. So far they are not saying what they intend to do.

Mr. Saiful’s family, though, are adamant that Mr. Anwar really did sodomize the young man and that it wasn’t a political conspiracy to destroy a strengthening opposition movement, as Mr. Anwar says (and which the government denies).

There is enough uncertainty around the case to suggest that those Malaysians who already believe the opposition leader is guilty may not change their minds. Justice Zabidin ruled Monday that Mr. Saiful’s testimony was uncorroborated. He said the court was reluctant to convict Mr. Anwar based on Mr. Saiful’s word alone, and that the CSI-style DNA evidence presented by the prosecution was flawed and insufficient to support a conviction. Mr. Anwar’s previous sodomy conviction in 1999, which was overturned in 2004, was based on witness testimony.

In addition, three of Mr. Anwar’s political foes last year released a video tape of a man whom they say is Mr. Anwar having sex with a prostitute. Mr. Anwar and his family deny he is the man in the tape, but the lingering controversy suggests that Malaysia’s political dramas might continue for months yet. Mr. Saiful might not disappear from the public eye as easily as he might hope.

Mr. Saiful worked briefly for the Malaysian opposition’s election campaign in 2008. Volunteers such as Mr. Saiful helped make a crucial difference. The opposition won over a third of the seats in Malaysia’s Parliament, casting a chill over the ruling National Front coalition that has governed Malaysia since independence from Britain in 1957 and inspiring talk of a “political tsunami” in this closely controlled nation.

Then Mr. Saiful’s life took a radically different direction.

He visited Najib Razak, then deputy prime minister, and told him that Mr. Anwar had sodomized him at a Kuala Lumpur condominium complex. Mr. Najib said he told Mr. Saiful to do what he felt was right – and Mr. Saiful soon filed a police complaint against Mr. Anwar, setting in motion a dramatic chain of events in which he testified in court that, among other things, the 64-year-old opposition leader roughly sodomized him before treating him to coffee and curry pastries.

Mr. Saiful stayed away from commenting on the verdict.

Instead, he logged onto Twitter to say that he would “remain calm, continue praying and be patient.”

- Celine Fernandez in Kuala Lumpur contributed to this article.

 

Anwar Not Guilty
Mahathir's view on Sodomy II verdict
RTM 2 Tamil News
Bernama Tamil News
Bernama Malay News
 

Dr M: Acquittal proves no conspiracy against Anwar
January 09, 2012, Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 9 – Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad said today that Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s acquittal from a sodomy charge proved there was no political conspiracy against his one-time protege.

The former prime minister (picture) added that today’s court ruling would also go towards cleansing the image and credibility of the Barisan Nasional (BN) government.

“Even though I was surprised that he was found innocent this proves there is no conspiracy from before until now,” he told reporters after attending a function in Putrajaya today.

Anwar, 64, had been similarly indicted of sodomy over a decade ago and was found guilty. He spent six years in jail before being exonerated.

In the 1990s Anwar had been groomed to succeed Dr Mahathir until a bitter row between them saw Anwar ousted in 1998.

Anwar has maintained that his prosecution for sodomy was politically-motivated and a plot to kill his political career.

Today’s verdict defied the expectations of political observers and even Anwar, who had alleged that a guilty verdict was predetermined.

Dr Mahathir said the opposition’s negative perception of the judiciary was clearly wrong and had no basis.

“Some people say that this government is cruel, to the point that it manipulates judges. This has never happened,” he said.

The High Court today acquitted Anwar of a charge of sodomising his former male aide Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan.

Judge Mohd Zabidin Mohd Diah ruled that the prosecution had not done enough to prove Anwar had committed sodomy against Saiful.

 

 

 
 
Disclaimer: The views expressed by the authors and comments on this website are the sole responsibility of the writers themselves. The writer will take full responsibility, liability, and blame for any libel or litigation that results from something written in or as a direct result of something written in a comment. The accuracy, completeness, honesty, exactitude and factuality of the articles and comments are not guaranteed by imol.
Send mail to sound20 [at] gmail.com If you do not wish any of your writing republished here or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 1998 imol